Dids
Well-known member
- First Name
- Les
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2019
- Messages
- 948
- Reaction score
- 1,714
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Vehicles
- 04 Tacoma, 21 Cybertruck
- Occupation
- Self
People pay for convenience. In some cases the belief that a RT would be more convenient because you don't have to park etc will be offset by FSD being able to self park.
I think RT will be very popular in cities just as taxis are but I do not think the majority of cars will be public.
FSD will be value add, this means that a private car utility/dollar will increase making it even more affordable. If FSD is 200x better than humans insurance will cost(not the same as price) 200x less.
FSD will speed up traffic, this is a huge aggregate productivity boost and a productivity boost is a wealth boost.
FSD will reduce cost of goods due to robo trucking.
FSD will enlarge the commuter area. People will commute longer trips daily. They will be willing to spend even more time in a car if they are able to do things other than driving.
I think these macro economics point towards less ridesharing, not more and I hope finally kill mass transit.
I think RT will be very popular in cities just as taxis are but I do not think the majority of cars will be public.
FSD will be value add, this means that a private car utility/dollar will increase making it even more affordable. If FSD is 200x better than humans insurance will cost(not the same as price) 200x less.
FSD will speed up traffic, this is a huge aggregate productivity boost and a productivity boost is a wealth boost.
FSD will reduce cost of goods due to robo trucking.
FSD will enlarge the commuter area. People will commute longer trips daily. They will be willing to spend even more time in a car if they are able to do things other than driving.
I think these macro economics point towards less ridesharing, not more and I hope finally kill mass transit.