MPGe help & predictions

exdxgxe4life

New member
Joined
Jul 16, 2020
Messages
4
Reaction score
3
Location
53150
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Country flag
Hey everyone,

I've probably read this article a zillion times: Cybertruck MPGe

I'm struggling however to fully understand MPGe. I currently drive a Prius and a Nissan Titan. The cybertruck will replace both. With all the math I'm doing, I'm struggling to see how I'll be saving money. If I go at face value, I will be gaining 20 MPGe over my Prius, which averages 50mpg and according to the Reddit article which states the CT Dual motor will get 69/70 mpge.

Sooooo....

My Prius has 160,000 miles and averages 50 MPG. That means over the course of the vehicle I've used 3,200 gallons of gas and if I average gas at $2.50 I would have spend $8,000 in gas.

The Cybertruck will get 70 MPGe. If I assume that I drive 160,000 miles on the CT and I use the 33.7 KW / gallon that means that I would have used 539,200 KWH of energy. at 13 cents per kwh, I would have spent $14,019.20 in energy cost.

That can't be right. Any help would be appreciated.





Advertisement

 
Last edited:

MEDICALJMP

Well-known member
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Apr 28, 2020
Messages
687
Reaction score
1,148
Location
Omaha, NE
Vehicles
Toyota Avalon, Rav4, Tri-motor Cybertruck
Occupation
Nurse
Country flag
Hey everyone,

I've probably read this article a zillion times: Cybertruck MPGe

I'm struggling however to fully understand MPGe. I currently drive a Prius and a Nissan Titan. The cybertruck will replace both. With all the math I'm doing, I'm struggling to see how I'll be saving money. If I go at face value, I will be gaining 20 MPGe over my Prius, which averages 50mpg and according to the Reddit article which states the CT Dual motor will get 69/70 mpge.

Sooooo....

My Prius has 160,000 miles and averages 50 MPG. That means over the course of the vehicle I've used 3,200 gallons of gas and if I average gas at $2.50 I would have spend $8,000 in gas.

The Cybertruck will get 70 MPGe. If I assume that I drive 160,000 miles on the CT and I use the 33.7 KW / gallon that means that I would have used 539,200 KWH of energy. at 13 cents per kwh, I would have spent $14,019.20 in energy cost.

That can't be right. Any help would be appreciated.

I will let someone with more knowledge in MPGe answer your main question. I just want to point out that you are replacing 2 vehicles, one being a hybrid and the other being an ICE truck. I am going to guess that you may have a 6+ year old truck. A quick search says

2015 Nissan Titan 4WD
MPG: 12 city, 17 hwy

What have you spent on fuel for that Titan? Miles driven? This is all part of the equation.
 
OP

exdxgxe4life

New member
Joined
Jul 16, 2020
Messages
4
Reaction score
3
Location
53150
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Country flag
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #3
I will let someone with more knowledge in MPGe answer your main question. I just want to point out that you are replacing 2 vehicles, one being a hybrid and the other being an ICE truck. I am going to guess that you may have a 6+ year old truck. A quick search says

2015 Nissan Titan 4WD
MPG: 12 city, 17 hwy

What have you spent on fuel for that Titan? Miles driven? This is all part of the equation.
Yeah, good point, I didn't mention that. It's a 2006 titan. I only drive it occasionally for errands and home projects. Not many miles put on. My prius is 95% of my driving.
 

CyberT

Active member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Messages
35
Reaction score
82
Location
Orange County, CA
Vehicles
2018 Model 3 LR RWD & 2003 Silverado
Occupation
Service Technician
Country flag
Hey everyone,

I've probably read this article a zillion times: Cybertruck MPGe

I'm struggling however to fully understand MPGe. I currently drive a Prius and a Nissan Titan. The cybertruck will replace both. With all the math I'm doing, I'm struggling to see how I'll be saving money. If I go at face value, I will be gaining 20 MPGe over my Prius, which averages 50mpg and according to the Reddit article which states the CT Dual motor will get 69/70 mpge.

Sooooo....

My Prius has 160,000 miles and averages 50 MPG. That means over the course of the vehicle I've used 3,200 gallons of gas and if I average gas at $2.50 I would have spend $8,000 in gas.

The Cybertruck will get 70 MPGe. If I assume that I drive 160,000 miles on the CT and I use the 33.7 KW / gallon that means that I would have used 539,200 KWH of energy. at 13 cents per kwh, I would have spent $14,019.20 in energy cost.

That can't be right. Any help would be appreciated.
The information in this Reddit post is over 1 year old and is highly speculative. By the time the CT comes out there will be a massive flood of posts and YouTube videos from the first few that are delivered. We will have all the information soon.

Elon said that the production version will be better than the prototype. I have a feeling that these range numbers are going to be blown away.

My advice is to keep saving and planning on having your CT delivered.
 

qreese

New member
First Name
Quincy
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
1
Reaction score
3
Location
Welaska
Vehicles
Cyber truck Model y
Occupation
Worker
Country flag
What will ICE fuel cost be in 2022/2023/2024? I would think prices would continue to rise. Significantly under this administration. Thoughts anyone?
 

Crissa

Well-known member
First Name
Crissa
Joined
Jul 8, 2020
Messages
3,037
Reaction score
3,205
Location
Santa Cruz
Vehicles
2014 Zero S, 2013 Mazda 3
Country flag
You 70mpge is also on the low end of what the Cybertruck will do given early estimates.

But comparing it to a Prius, well, you might as well compare it to a Model 3. Of course it will do worse.

An 85 mpge is more likely. That's 2.5mi/kWh, or $8320 under your electricity price.

And $2.5/gallon is pretty average, but it's 40% under the peak. So say we hit a more robust world economy and the gasoline price rises again, you're spending $11,200 in gas.

Also, mpge is really only useful to note how efficient it is compared to a gas car; it doesn't say anything about cost per mile or per cargo load.

-Crissa
 
OP

exdxgxe4life

New member
Joined
Jul 16, 2020
Messages
4
Reaction score
3
Location
53150
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Country flag
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #7
You 70mpge is also on the low end of what the Cybertruck will do given early estimates.

But comparing it to a Prius, well, you might as well compare it to a Model 3. Of course it will do worse.

An 85 mpge is more likely. That's 2.5mi/kWh, or $8320 under your electricity price.

And $2.5/gallon is pretty average, but it's 40% under the peak. So say we hit a more robust world economy and the gasoline price rises again, you're spending $11,200 in gas.

Also, mpge is really only useful to note how efficient it is compared to a gas car; it doesn't say anything about cost per mile or per cargo load.

-Crissa

Thanks for the reply! Certainly comparing the prius and cybertruck are apples and oranges. Again, at face value with the Cybertruck MPGe at 70~80 (maybe more) I just assumed it would be an instant cost savings. It's well within the realm of possibility that I'm a total idiot but it seems like MPGe is a sudo science if 50 MPG is better than 70~80 MPGe~.
 

Crissa

Well-known member
First Name
Crissa
Joined
Jul 8, 2020
Messages
3,037
Reaction score
3,205
Location
Santa Cruz
Vehicles
2014 Zero S, 2013 Mazda 3
Country flag
... but it seems like MPGe is a sudo science if 50 MPG is better than 70~80 MPGe~.
No, you're not. The problem is your apples to oranges, like you said. Your mpge is costing you 4.38 a 'gallon'. That's going to complicate things.

It's no different than switching from gas to diesel for a higher 'miles per gallon' but then finding out your gallons cost more (well, they did where I grew up).

And it's no different than saying you need to carry a ton and a half of bricks ten miles. Well, it's going to take your Prius three trips at max laden whereas it would take the Cybertruck one trip.

You need to know your load and your fuel cost before we can begin to estimate.

And for all we know, you end up going up and down long hills. Well, a Cybertruck can absorb more regen than a Prius can. Or maybe you end up crawling alot at low speed and high acceleration, like bad freeway traffic. Well, the BEV will do better at that than the hybrid, too. Big battery means never having to idle the booster motor and no motor to spin up to accelerate.

It really depends on what you're doing.

-Crissa
 
OP

exdxgxe4life

New member
Joined
Jul 16, 2020
Messages
4
Reaction score
3
Location
53150
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Country flag
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #9
For anyone that stumbles across this thread, here's my answer.

http://mpgecost.com/index.html

Yes, it will be more expensive to drive the CT then compared to my Prius. Again, I know it's apples and oranges, but I just find it very misleading that MPGe DOES not really relate to MPG. In my case 50 mpg is better than 80 MPGe in terms of cost savings (yes I know a lot of factors could change this).
 

Bill906

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 21, 2020
Messages
93
Reaction score
123
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicles
Jeep
Country flag
I think the confusion lies in the 33.7 kWh of energy in a gallon of gas. Although technically true, the part I believe people are overlooking is ICE engines are typically 30% efficient at best. So an ICE vehicle only uses about 10 kWh of that energy to move the car and dumps the other 23 kWh of energy out the radiator.

I haven't gone through the entire calculations to verify this, but that is my knee jerk response.
 

Crissa

Well-known member
First Name
Crissa
Joined
Jul 8, 2020
Messages
3,037
Reaction score
3,205
Location
Santa Cruz
Vehicles
2014 Zero S, 2013 Mazda 3
Country flag
I haven't gone through the entire calculations to verify this, but that is my knee jerk response.
Yes. But even an EV loses some energy to heat.

The big difference comes in the cost of that gallon: A gallon of gas might cost you $2.5 and an electric 'gallon' $4. A diesel gets from 15-30% more mpg, but it might cost only 10% more at $2.75 so there's a slip where it might be even cheaper per dollar...

.But of course it's not better for whoever is standing next to it. Or downwind. Or climate change.

-Crissa
 

Advertisement





 


Advertisement
Top