ajdelange
Well-known member
- First Name
- A. J.
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2019
- Messages
- 2,173
- Reaction score
- 2,283
- Location
- Virginia/Quebec
- Vehicles
- Tesla X LR+, Lexus SUV, Toyota SR5, Toyota Landcruiser
- Occupation
- EE (Retired)
Huh?
What?Huh?
What I mean is I can't follow your non sequiturs. Are you implying that Rivian's scheme for fast charging their battery in their 400 V architecture is somehow unsafe? If that's the case what do you think is unsafe about it?
What I mean is I can't follow your non sequiturs. Are you implying that Rivian's scheme for fast charging their battery in their 400 V architecture is somehow unsafe? If that's the case what do you think is unsafe about it?
Ok, I remember you mentioned that earlier.It won’t be in the first trucks they sell AFAIK and may never actually be used but they have applied for a patent for a scheme in which two 400 V batteries are in parallel for normal 400 V operation of the truck but are switched to series connection for charging from a high power 800 V charger.
It won’t be in the first trucks they sell AFAIK and may never actually be used but they have applied for a patent for a scheme in which two 400 V batteries are in parallel for normal 400 V operation of the truck but are switched to series connection for charging from a high power 800 V charger.
Ok, but doesn't the power electronics have to be setup for that? I did read where in Europe there was a glitch in the Tesla SC that allowed other EV's to charge for free using the Tesla SC. I think they got the glitch fixed though...,..,...The vehicle on board charger isn’t involved in fast charging. Tesla V3 chargers just push more current.
I doubt it. As is the case with Rivian they are heavily invested in 400 V motors, inverters and chargers at this point and it isn't that easy to overcome inertia. Going to an 800 V electrical system represents a tremendous investment in redesign. As is the case with Rivian, though, you can bet they are thinking about this.
I predict that the “glitch” was a planned distraction. Tesla is gauging non-Tesla usage on the SC network because you will see a future Supercharging partnership between Volkswagen Group and Tesla. Tesla is gathering data on Supercharger use to determine pricing when negotiating with VW in the near future.
I feel the purpose of the VW visit between Musk and Diess was exactly for this topic and why the two had a private 1 on 1 conversation inside of the ID3, outside of other executives earshot. Did Elon tour Wolfsburg and meet the executive team? Nope. Also, remember that Diess was recently demoted. I wouldn’t be surprised if Elon offers Diess a position as the head of Tesla European operations. He knows everyone in Europe and would be a perfect candidate.
Yes. This is a classic interface situation involving a hardware interface and a software/firmware one. The vehicle is ultimately in control during charging. In a Level 2 charge the charger is located in the car. In Level 3 it is external to it. But, rumor has it, in the early days at least, it was the same charger i.e. the cabinets at a Tesla SC were reported to be racks of M3 charger modules.Ok, but doesn't the power electronics have to be setup for that?
I'll bet there was a code fragment that looked likeI did read where in Europe there was a glitch in the Tesla SC that allowed other EV's to charge for free using the Tesla SC. I think they got the glitch fixed though...,..,...