cybertruck808
Well-known member
- First Name
- Ray
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2020
- Messages
- 54
- Reaction score
- 31
- Location
- Washington, DC via NYC via Honolulu
- Vehicles
- Jeep Renegade
- Occupation
- Military
And for those who think such is a worthwhile investment/use of their money, I say more power to them. I'm just not convinced that it is worth it for me to spend that extra money when I likely won't be able to utilize the full spectrum of FSD on the road anytime soon.Well, you aren't going to be able to have the Cybertruck for quite some time, either. But if you buy FSD, you'll be able to use the features as they're released/legalized. It's not illegal to use current released features in any state. Nor illegal to use it in parking lots and private property.
-Crissa
Do you have something to support that it is not illegal to use the current released features in any state? From what I gather, this refers to there not being legislation in any state that explicitly bans any form of autonomous driving (only a handful of states have actually passed legislation specifically authorizing the practice, though), but there are other laws and legal assumptions that don't explicitly deal with autonomous driving that could be used by authorities to pull you over/make an arrest for utilizing certain FSD features today I'd wager: https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/are-self-driving-cars-legal-31687#:~:text=Since the beginning of 2012,actually enacted any such laws.
I'm thinking of laws concerning the requirement to have a permit or drivers license to "operate a motor vehicle." I'm sure more than a few states will argue that "operate" means actually having physical/personal/hands-on control of a vehicle consistent with the skills you proved that you learned in obtaining your permit/license to begin with.
For instance, in Massachusetts:
"A person “operates” a motor vehicle not only while doing all of the well-known things that drivers do as they travel on a street or highway, but also when doing any act which directly tends to set the vehicle in motion. The law is that a person is “operating” a motor vehicle whenever he or she is in the vehicle and intentionally manipulates some mechanical or electrical part of the vehicle — like the gear shift or the ignition — which, alone or in sequence, will set the vehicle in motion."
https://www.mass.gov/doc/3200-operation-of-a-motor-vehicle/download#:~:text=The law is that a,Commonwealth v.
I also note that the common law definition of "operation" generally involves the actual physical handling or manipulation of the electrical or mechanical controls of a motor vehicle, including the starting of the vehicle's engine. And there must be evidence that someone exercised some control or manipulation over the vehicle, such as steering or braking, etc.
https://www.teamdui.com/what-constitutes-operating-a-vehicle/ (note, this common law stuff deals with arguments over DUIs, but the overall point remains).
In Michigan, operating a vehicle requires you to be in actual physical control of a vehicle.
https://www.baronedefensefirm.com/blog/definition-of-driving-in-dui-cases/
That seems like more than enough to argue that various FSD features aren't legal everywhere. Still, there is a level of vagueness there. But this vagueness and uncertainty are something to consider as well when making your decision.
Last edited: