ajdelange
Well-known member
- First Name
- A. J.
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2019
- Messages
- 2,173
- Reaction score
- 2,283
- Location
- Virginia/Quebec
- Vehicles
- Tesla X LR+, Lexus SUV, Toyota SR5, Toyota Landcruiser
- Occupation
- EE (Retired)
Your bio indicates you drive an S. Have you noticed any improvement in Summon or Autopark over the past 2 years? I haven't but perhaps you have.When I see what has been accomplished with ML in the past 2 years alone (and I am by no means a champion of ML), it is not beyond my imagination to see Tesla tackle parking with great success, and perhaps try trailer mechanations.
Naturally I have too. I hope I am not one of those. I have no trouble accepting that an engineer who lacks vision will be as naive as a layman.Your reference to engineers as seeing things that others don’t is narrow. Some engineers do, yes. Engineers, like everything else, are variable in their understanding of physics and in their vision. I meet people trained in engineering every day that don’t know the first thing about how things work.
I think it only fair to mention at this juncture that I do know lay people who have the kind of vision of which I speak.
I did not suggest that engineers are more open minded than anyone else. I've known some of them to be the most stubborn SOBs I've ever met. What I'm really getting at is that engineers are more likely to be Bayesians than other people. That means they weigh what they see with what they know in assessing the liklihood of something. You, for example, may have observed great improvement in the assisted driving prowess of your S and if so I would expect you to think rapid improvement more likely than I who have, if anything, found autopark to be less capable. Of course my feeling that engineers are more likely to be Bayesian is in itself biased by Bayesian logic as Bayes theorem was an incredibly and frequently valuable tool for me throughout my career.It may well be that a truck driving a trailer and parking it might exceed your lifetime and, given your experience with FSD, that very experience may preclude seeing the technology with as open a mind as you suggest engineers in general have.
Let's forget the trailer for a moment. How would I get my X to do that with its current FSD capability (I don't have the latest release i.e. the one that has gone out to the selected users).Sometimes when I pull my trailer back to a parking space it is a very simple task. Pull straight forward from the ramp to an already empty space. FSD could do that now no problem.
I know how to get it to go forwards and backwards in a straight line over a few feet but i don't know how to get it to find a parking spot. At the ramp I use there are no parking spots in line with the ramp itself. You have to find your way to the parking lot. I guess you could park head in but most people back in.
How does the current FSD prevent the rear end of the trailer from hitting something or are you saying it only works if the parking spot is aligned with the axis of the boat ramp?
Did you perhaps overlook the part of my post where I explained why I used the word "probability" and what the implications of that word are in this context?It is our way, as engineers, to see the world as a continuum, not in all or none ways.
Again I suspect that you missed the significance of the probabilistic aspects of this. I used Bayesian reasoning (as I do, consciously or unconsciously) to pick a dozen BEV related stocks and bought a couple of shares of each. As of half an hour ago all were winners. Last week about half were losers. So am I a visionary or lucky?Well, you’ve laid down the gauntlet and now we can only wait and see what happens and then evaluate your vision and skills of prediction.
I'll answer that with an observation (which, as I'm a Bayesian, influences my perspective). I never met anyone who won the lottery. All the lucky people I know were visionaries.
Last edited: