I remembered this:
MS Long range from 345 to 373, increased by 28 miles (8%)
M3 long range from 310 to 322, increased by 12 miles (4%)
MY long range from 280 (original est. should be at 300)* to 315, increased by 35 (15)* miles, WOW (12.5%) (5%)*
CT Tri-Motor from 500+ to 562 (525 with...
Here is my thought. The tri-motor CT got $139/mile/lifetime usage of 500,000 miles = .000278 cent. That is a bargain.
I estimated the CT will have a 180 kWh battery. 3 miles per kWh. CT will have about 540 (or more) miles range.
The long range is not for everyone but for me I preferred. I would use my CT as an expedition/adventure vehicle. I will add a custom extended camper to match the design and massive 1200 watts solar charger. It's going to be great!
Rest a sure Tesla engineer will solve all the safety functions and features. Look at all the 5-tars crash test Tesla earned for MX,MS & M3. It all good.
After seeing all other car design except for the M1 tank. To me they look dated. Cybertruck is the superior design. Notice how the other car used curves for exterior structure, make them look not appealing to me anymore.
Every other car maker criticized Tesla because they could not imagine the current result. They don't admitted from beginning because they wanted Tesla to fail. Now they just trying to minimize the embarrassment. Consequences for ignored the future.
If changes should be done, Tesla Engineering team will decide, and I good with that. I don't really for other design opinions other than Tesla original design.
I would love for the longer range and will get the Solar charging option also. I would build a custom camper siting on top of the bed with additional solar panels and go for a adventure, off-road and off grid.
Same as many here. I have own many ICE cars in my life. I bought my Model S a year ago and love it. I let my wife drive it because she works further than me. I bought the Nissan Titan truck back in 2004 when it first came out but then sold it because it not efficient at all. I love EV now. I...