cybertruckthatisaboat2
Member
- First Name
- John
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2020
- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 14
- Location
- davie fl
- Vehicles
- Model 3
- Occupation
- University Professor
- Thread starter
- #1
For those who are apposed to the $7,500 rebate ONLY.
There is no salery cap on any EV rebate. My wife is very set on having at least one hybrid and we will get it for her car.I never got any because I am employed and my salary is over $65K or whatever (and how would I ever afford a CT if it wasn’t?), and isn’t there is a salary cap on those EV rebates? I think that you make assumptions about the rebates and the ppp that are unwarranted.
Not according to this and many other links, but would not be an issue for anyone receiving ppp: https://cleanvehiclerebate.org/eng/income-eligibility as the income limit is $150,000. According to the following, there was an income requirement for stimulus checks as well: https://www.cnet.com/personal-finan...thing-you-need-to-know-about-the-irs-payment/There is no salery cap on any EV rebate. My wife is very set on having at least one hybrid and we will get it for her car.
I am also not opposed to the EV rebates but I think they should go for vehicles that will push the expansion of EVs the most and be income limited. I think the federal government phased the rebates out too quickly. I also think, while I am at it, that HOV lane stickers should be income limited.For those who are apposed to the $7,500 rebate ONLY.
You misunderstand the purpose of the subsidy. It is not intended to benefit the wealthy (though it does, of course) it is/was intended to benefit the manufacturers to the point where more of them would be able to produce electric cars. Most of us are smart enough to perceive that wider adoption of BEVs would benefit society as a whole in several ways.A lump sum aimed to help an entire country affected by a worldwide pandemic vs a subsidy that benefits a primarily wealthy demographic on what amounts to a toy. These are not the same thing.
I get that, and it is valuable to Tesla and their infrastructure to build as many CT’s as possible which a subsidy helps with. If Tesla ever envisions itself making an affordable mass market vehicle (debatable?) then they need as much experience as possible. For now though this is just a tax break on people buying $40k+ vehicles, and if Elon is right, they already have years of demand in waiting without the subsidy.You misunderstand the purpose of the subsidy. It is not intended to benefit the wealthy (though it does, of course) it is/was intended to benefit the manufacturers to the point where more of them would be able to produce electric cars. Most of us are smart enough to perceive that wider adoption of BEVs would benefit society as a whole in several ways.
I remember Margaret Thatcher saying that one thing she just could not understand about liberals was that they were willing to hurt everyone in order to forestall any benefit to the wealthy. I'm with Maggie.
Not much to debate there. The average American apparently paid $37K for his car last year. The M3 is now selling for $38K without any subsidy and Tesla estimates cost savings of $7K relative to an ICE vehicle but shelve that as the consumer is interested in what he can get it off the lot for. If the promises of battery day are realized then Tesla will be at or below parity with ICE vehicles and the game will, presumably, be over for ICE.If Tesla ever envisions itself making an affordable mass market vehicle (debatable?)
You still aren't getting it. It is an incentive to the Rivian's, Fiskers, Nikolas, Jaguars, BMWs, Fords... to produce BEVs. Unfortunately none of them are building BEVs that people want to buy because Tesla is so far out front and so the benefit intended to accrue to them by the rebate is not being realized.For now though this is just a tax break on people buying $40k+ vehicles,